Microphones
Audio-Technica AT4033-CL
A strong up-front presence characterizes the sonic signature of this versatile pro-audio classic

Transformerless circuitry virtually eliminates low-frequency distortion and provides superior correlation of high-speed transients

Precision-machined, nickel-plated brass, acoustic element baffle provides enhanced element stability and optimal sensitivity

The 2-micron-thick, vapor-deposited gold diaphragm undergoes a five-step aging process so that the optimum characteristics achieved remain constant over years of use

Floating-construction capsule assembly provides isolation from noise and vibration

Open acoustical environment of the symmetrical housing assembly minimizes unwanted internal reflections

State-of-the-art surface-mount electronics ensure compliance with A-T's stringent consistency and reliability standards

700.00

AT4033/CL Specifications
Element Dynamic Range (Typical)
  Condenser
 
 

128 dB, 1 kHz at Max. SPL
 

Polar Pattern Phantom Power Requirements
  Cardioid
 
  48V (±4V)
 
Frequency Response Switches
  30 - 20,000 Hz
 
  10 dB pad; roll-off
 
Open Circuit Sensitivity Low Frequency Roll-off
  -32 dB (25.1 mV), ±2 dB re 1V at 1 Pa
 
  80 Hz, 12 dB per octave
 
Impedance Weight
  100 ohms
 
  13.4 oz (380 g)
 
Maximum Input Sound Level Output Connector
  145 dB SPL, 1 kHz at 1% T.H.D.
 
  XLRM-type
Signal to Noise Ratio
77 dB, 1 kHz at 1 Pa

 

One Person's Experience with the AT4033

I first got the idea to try this microphone after watching Doyle Lawson perform using a  single mic. I was blown away by the stage presentation and visual dynamics of the show. My group, Foxtail, tried it out one evening in a local hotel in London, ON. The other band members were skeptical (they had not seen anyone using a single mic before) and convinced it wouldn't work. The truth is, a hotel setting was probably the worse test possible for this new idea. The single microphone is unforgiving, if you don't know how to work it for maximum benefit. We had lots of fun, bumping into each other, getting in each other's way, and generally making a mess of it. After the evening was over, we were 50/50 on the microphone. We could see benefits, but also the need for much more discipline in our interrelationship on stage. "The dance". We rehearsed working the microphone at all our rehearsals, learning how to move & get in and out without hitting someone in the process.

Now, one thing I should mention, is that Doyle Lawson was using a tube preamplifier and some very fancy and expensive compression equipment. We are using the microphone directly into the sound system. We have purchased an inexpensive feedback eliminator (from Roland Electronics) which we use when playing small gigs in noisy environments, such as bars and taverns. When at outdoor events such as festivals, etc., we plug right into the sound system.


We have been using our AT4033 for about 6 years - and I can say that, for our band, it would be unthinkable to return to eight microphones and lose the freedom of movement we now enjoy. That's not to say that it will suit everyone. Each band must play in its own comfort zone, and produce the best overall sound they can. For many, that means a modern approach, with each player on an individual microphone.  Using a single mic, it is difficult to achieve the instantaneous dynamics of the multi-mic approach, and the bands which do this well are just as exciting on stage as any using the single mic approach.  

The pros of the single microphone, versus the multi-mic approach, are as follows:
Minimum setup time before performance.
Absolutely no time taken to balance the sound system, adjust volumes, etc.
Freedom to move on stage - creates visual excitement for your performance.
Much more interaction between players - we can 'play off each other' much easier.
Vocal harmony blend is consistent - we have full control over balance and blend.
Re-above - communications between singers is so much better!
●We did our first recording at 1/2 the price, because we used a single microphone in the studio. A small disadvantage is losing the ability to overdub and correct errors, etc. Big advantage is that the recording has the feel of a live session, (which it was) and better dynamics than a lot of other self-produced projects. You can hear some of our recorded material here.

Just as a final note - we have seen many examples of other bands using cheaper microphones. I have not yet seen another brand that will match the Audio-Technica! If $700.00 bucks Canadian seems like a lot, don't even bother trying the single microphone. You spend several thousands of dollars on your instrument. If you play with single microphones, you will have five to 12 mics at $150.00 each, plus the requirement for a sound system capable of handling that many inputs. We have sold the AT4033CL to several bands who have wasted money on a 'cheap' clone, then finally have come to the conclusion that the AT is the only way to go.