Audio-Technica AT4033-CL
A strong up-front presence characterizes the sonic signature of this versatile
pro-audio classic
Transformerless circuitry virtually eliminates low-frequency distortion and
provides superior correlation of high-speed transients
Precision-machined, nickel-plated brass, acoustic element baffle provides
enhanced element stability and optimal sensitivity
The 2-micron-thick, vapor-deposited gold diaphragm undergoes a five-step aging
process so that the optimum characteristics achieved remain constant over years
of use
Floating-construction capsule assembly provides isolation from noise and vibration
Open acoustical environment of the symmetrical housing assembly minimizes
unwanted internal reflections
State-of-the-art surface-mount electronics ensure compliance with A-T's stringent
consistency and reliability standards
700.00
AT4033/CL Specifications
Element
Dynamic Range (Typical)
Condenser
128 dB, 1 kHz at
Max. SPL
Polar Pattern
Phantom Power Requirements
Cardioid
48V (±4V)
Frequency Response
Switches
30 - 20,000 Hz
10 dB pad; roll-off
Open Circuit Sensitivity
Low Frequency Roll-off
-32 dB (25.1 mV), ±2 dB re
1V at 1 Pa
80 Hz, 12 dB per octave
Impedance
Weight
100 ohms
13.4 oz (380 g)
Maximum Input Sound Level
Output Connector
145 dB SPL, 1 kHz at 1% T.H.D.
XLRM-type
Signal to Noise Ratio
77 dB, 1 kHz at 1 Pa
One Person's Experience with the AT4033
I first
got the idea to try this microphone after watching Doyle Lawson perform using
a single
mic. I was blown away by the stage presentation and visual dynamics of the show.
My group, Foxtail, tried it out one evening in a local hotel in London, ON. The
other band members were skeptical (they had not seen anyone using a single mic
before) and convinced it wouldn't work. The truth is, a hotel setting was probably
the worse test possible for this new idea. The single microphone is unforgiving,
if you don't know how to work it for maximum benefit. We had lots of fun, bumping
into each other, getting in each other's way, and generally making a mess of
it. After the evening was over, we were 50/50 on the microphone. We could see
benefits, but also the need for much more discipline in our interrelationship
on stage. "The dance". We rehearsed working the microphone at all our
rehearsals, learning how to move & get in and out without hitting someone
in the process.
Now, one thing I should mention, is that Doyle Lawson was using a tube preamplifier
and some very fancy and expensive compression equipment. We are using the microphone
directly into the sound system. We have purchased an inexpensive feedback eliminator
(from Roland Electronics) which we use when playing small gigs in noisy environments,
such as bars and taverns. When at outdoor events such as festivals, etc., we
plug right into the sound system.
We have been using our
AT4033 for about 6 years - and I can say that, for our band, it would be unthinkable
to return to eight microphones and lose the freedom of movement we now enjoy.
That's not to say that it will suit everyone. Each band must play in its own
comfort zone, and produce the best overall sound they can. For many, that means
a modern approach, with each player on an individual microphone. Using
a single mic, it is difficult to achieve the instantaneous dynamics of the multi-mic
approach, and the bands which do this well are just as exciting on stage as any
using the single mic approach.
The pros of the single microphone, versus the multi-mic approach,
are as follows:
●Minimum setup time before performance.
●Absolutely no time taken to balance the sound
system, adjust volumes, etc.
●Freedom to move on stage - creates visual excitement
for your performance.
●Much more interaction between players - we can
'play off each other' much easier.
●Vocal harmony blend is consistent - we have
full control over balance and blend.
●Re-above - communications between singers is
so much better!
●We did our first recording at 1/2 the price, because
we used a single microphone in the studio. A small disadvantage is losing the
ability to overdub and correct errors, etc. Big advantage is that the recording
has the feel of a live session, (which it was) and better dynamics than a lot
of other self-produced projects. You can hear some of our recorded material here.
Just as a final note - we have seen many examples
of other bands using cheaper microphones. I have not yet seen another brand that
will match the Audio-Technica! If $700.00 bucks Canadian seems like a lot, don't
even bother trying the single microphone. You spend several thousands of dollars
on your instrument. If you play with single microphones, you will have five to
12 mics at $150.00 each, plus the requirement for a sound system capable of handling
that many inputs. We have sold the AT4033CL to several bands who have wasted
money on a 'cheap' clone, then finally have come to the conclusion that the AT
is the only way to go.